Play'n GO · Horror, Sci Fi
Ghost Booster! GO Guaranteed
01 October 2026 · yesterday · medium
TBAmax win
Free play. 18+
Demo provided by Play'n GO
| RTP | 96.25% |
|---|---|
| RTP versions in circulation | 96.25%, 94.25%, 91.25%, 87.25%, 84.25% |
| Layout | 5 reels, 20 paylines |
| Volatility | medium — studio says „Medium (6/10)“ |
| Volatility score | Not announced yet |
| RTP split | Not announced yet |
| RTP when buying the bonus | Not announced yet |
| Max win probability | Not announced yet |
| Free spins frequency | Not announced yet |
| Win 100x or more | Not announced yet |
| Hit frequency | Not announced yet |
| Bet range | 0.2 – 100.0 |
| Bonus buy | Not available |
Over 10,000 spins at €1, the 84.25% version costs about €1 200 more than the 96.25% version. See the maths →
This page updates as soon as the studio confirms its figures. We post every update on X — @prespinscom
Mechanics
- GO Guaranteed Meter
- Hold & Spin
- Wheel of Spooks
- Coin Collection
What we know
Ghost Booster! GO Guaranteed went live on 1 October, and the suffix is the part that matters. GO Guaranteed is a Play'n GO sub-brand built around one idea: a floor under the bonus round.
A meter sits above the reels through the base game. Collector symbols landing without coins beside them push it up a level, five levels in all, and each level raises the minimum the Hold & Spin round can pay. When the bonus finishes below that figure, the meter tops it up. That is an unusual thing to publish, because it converts the worst case of a feature from unknown into stated - and the worst case is normally where slots stay quietest.
Around it: six or more coins trigger Hold & Spin with three respins that reset on every new symbol, and a Wheel of Spooks pays one of four jackpot tiers.
The ladder is the house set, five builds twelve points apart, 96.25% down to 84.25%. Variance is rated Medium and sits at six of ten, across five reels and twenty paylines.
No maximum win. The catalogue carries an exposure amount rather than a multiplier, and the conversion we would need is not reliable enough to publish a figure from.