Free play. 18+
Demo provided by Print Studios
| RTP | 96.22% |
|---|---|
| RTP versions in circulation | 96.22%, 94.29%, 86.22% |
| Layout | 5x4, scatter pays |
| Volatility | high — studio says „High (9 out of 10)“ |
| Volatility score | Not announced yet |
| RTP split | Not announced yet |
| Max win probability | 1 in 78,125,000 spins |
| Free spins frequency | 1 in 254 spins |
| Win 100x or more | Not announced yet |
| Hit frequency | 38.13% |
| Bet range | 0.1 – 50.0 |
| Bonus buy | Available — cost unconfirmed |
Over 10,000 spins at €1, the 86.22% version costs about €1 000 more than the 96.22% version. See the maths →
Mechanics
- Cosmic Scatter Pays
- Cascades
- Prize Cards
- Divine Deck Bonus
- Card Packs
- Feature Buy
What we know
Print Studios is the smallest operation on this calendar by output — roughly one release a month against Pragmatic's four to six — and it has built a following on that scarcity. Wild Wild Bananas gave it a streamer audience, and the studio distributes through Relax Gaming's Silver Bullet programme rather than running its own network.
Deck of Divinity is flagged as the next release on the studio's own roadmap, dated 25 August 2026. The theme turns out to be cosmic rather than tarot: Earth, Moon, Sun, Stars and Aether as five energies on a 5x4 board. Five or more matching Symbol Cards anywhere trigger a win, cascades follow, and Prize Cards carry their value on the face - up to 10,000x on the top tier.
The figures are published, on the studio's own game page rather than the roadmap we had been reading: 96.22% return, a 20,000x ceiling and volatility rated 9 out of 10. A second figure sits beside it - 96.17% with the bonus bought - which few studios bother to print.
What is still missing is the hit rate and the stake range, and those matter here: a 9-out-of-10 variance rating against a 20,000x ceiling describes a long grind, and how long depends entirely on how often the board pays at all. The studio also links a gamesheet and a marketing pack from the page, so the remaining numbers may well exist behind that.